Administrative ethics (when subrange of the applied ethics) can be defined as the development and implementation more correctly, well justified behavior standards in public administrations. Administrative ethics is pre-aged thereby to the concrete application of the law and acting (in) the administration in certain way.
In the German-speaking countries the term "administrative ethics" so far little is common. Reasons for this lie obviously in strongly to legality (and less to legitimacy) aligned the administrative culture.
For this for instance the anglo American area forms a contrast, in which "public service ethics" an important, for a long time discussed topic field is. This is often seen in the connection with the fact that here traditionally rather an interest in moral questions prevails as at set right.
In the German-language administrative science yard masters (2000) in Switzerland as well as fist (2003) in Germany wrote the first more comprehensive papers over the topic administrative ethics.
In older (jurisprudential) literature contributions marginal note was granted to the administrative ethics at best a role: Rather one saw action need concerning constant Vermehrung and/or perfecting of legal rules. Logically the focus lay on a specification of the criminal law and Disziplinarrechts and one thereupon arranged control of the officials. Administrativeethicalally relevant facts of the German penal code are about bribery and corruptibility as well as advantage grant and advantage acceptance.
Ethical-critical reflections were regarded in contrast to this for a long time as pure threat of the predictability and reliability of public administrations. The ideal of the German tenured civil servant becomes by means of "§"§ 52 FF. Federal official law rather toward bearing seeds, self-sacrificing and devoted subjects of its service gentleman guided. To that extent occasionally the Remonstration stated as counterargument is able to change few in this estimate: It fristet in the administrative practice if necessary a shade existence - above all because remonstrierende officials have to very often be afraid (in) formal sanctions.
More current (organization-psychological) contributions argue meanwhile more differentiated: It is insufficient to claim from the individual alone the adherence to "hard" legal adjustments (Compliance). Rather also group-related played and "yield" phenomena in this connection an important role. Behavior-scientific studies show the necessity for the up and/or development intrinsischer motivation, in order to embody the integrity of public administrations lastingly.
Up-to-date is besides (politics) the scientific discussion around Governance and/or Good Governance obviously concerning administrativeethical questions in considerable measure connectionable. It shows in particular that ethics-conscious change is not alone the task of the public administration, but that rather also external participants (e.g. from the range of the civil company) have to contribute their part to an administrativeethical total concept.
The past ethics discourse makes clear not least also that the general change of value conceptions plays a central role. In the administrative science thus ever more frequently the relationship analyzed between
see also: New Public management, Kommunitarismus, Public management, bureaucracy, max of webers
In recent time however also the German administrative practice is concerned increasingly with ethical questions. Causes for this are to be seen particularly in the following - itself partly overlapping - problem areas:
The material and immaterial damage from ethics scandals is immense; their extent extracts itself - because of the enormously high dark number - from each respectablly founded estimation. Ever more is brought up for discussion in this connection also the progrediente loss at confidence into the public administration.
The critical public is after all appearance however less and less ready, these eclats humor-industrial union-shoulder-twitching as and/or abzutun: Civilian-social participants and Nichtregierungsorganisationen (e.g. Transparency international, TI) are formed for some time, who exert increasing pressure on politics and administration to take care of ethical problem fields lastingly. In this connection the Corruption Perceptions index (CPI), published annually by TI, experiences a considerable measure of public resonance.
In addition, international politics policies (e.g. European union) as well as think tanks (e.g. Bertelsmann donation) affect strengthened national Entscheider to intensify the considerations to an explicit administrative ethics. With internationally comparing studies it turned out that administrativeethical concepts depend strongly on on the right of and administrative tradition of the respective state: They are on the one hand rather a component - to a large extent invisible - of the organization culture, or they are embodied on the other hand rather in - explicit - standards and rules.
see also: Lobbyism, Public private Partnership, corruption in the European Union, Mobbing
Administrativeethical problem situations reveal thus an abundance more complex, deeply more seizing, often culturally conditioned phenomena. Ever more therefore becomes generally accepted the realization that these are to be worked on only by means of an holistic beginning: Exclusively for the virtue of individual persons to hope, seizes regularly too briefly; it would be just as missed in addition, to only concentrate on the institution-ethical arrangement of the basic conditions.
Concrete questions in the context of a practice-oriented administrative ethics are about:
see also: Reputation, integrity, uninformativeness, Mediation, conflict management, civil courage
We found here 13 articles.
We found here 4 related websites.
Index | Privacy | Terms Of Use | Sitemap | Feedback