Comparison of handwritings [2 / 2]

Printer Friendly Format

Bookmark this page

Back to "Kriminalistik"

Appraisals of handwriting experts are methodically in such a way developed that the aspects "„order "“, "„the investigation material "“, "„material criticism "“, "„execution of the investigation with finding collection and finding evaluation "“as well as "„result of the investigation "“. are treated. Graphologi appraisals have usually no such structure. It would be quite conceivable and meaningful to develop writing-psychological appraisals e.g. for companies after these aspects. That is to be described briefly:

The client gives the order for appraisal. That can happen in a Begleitbrief. The order for appraisal can e.g. contain the following formulation: "„Is looked for a selling-strong personality, that can convince by its radiant emittance and personal integrity, by contact joy and acquisition strength humans and to the conclusion of contracts comes. For the intended position are essential above average diligence and readiness of application as well as integration strength. "“

It is meaningful to list the investigation material: handwritten personal record, handwritten filled out application elbow, job description, requirement profile, newspaper advertisement, the complete application documents of an applicant with writing down, personal record, photo, training and references, data to advanced training and activity emphasis.

It is likewise meaningful to submit the available investigation material of a material criticism. One asks how the available investigation material is been suitable for the answer of the question the order for investigation. Which documents should have still been Are the requirements evident to the personality of the applicant and the technical Is there a problem Are the position, area of responsibility, number of coworkers and the intended salary mentioned in the job Is the Schriftmaterial extensive and expression strong Does it concern Does it contain of Are there work Was a personal discussion As result of the material criticism one judges, how meaningful the available investigation documents are for the answer of the question of the order for investigation.

At the time of the execution of the investigation it is meaningful, between technical and personal aspects to differentiate between the inspection and examination of the application documents and the analysis of the handwriting.

The result of the investigation answers the questions of the order for investigation. The appraisal should be a decision making aid for the client. And the appraisal should be linguistically so drawn up that it can be discussed with also the judged one. Writetechnical conditions

For handwriting experts it is natural to ask first for writetechnical conditions which could have affected a write achievement. In addition Schreibstift, writing carrier, Schreibunterlage, write attitude belongs.

Also in the respectable traditional Graphologie such aspects were considered. As example can be referred to the remarks from pan to the terms "„feather/spring "“, "„shock struts "“and "„feather/spring angles "“. Today with a penholder, but usually with ball-point pen one writes less. Also with ball-point pen writings material-technical influences are effective. Such writetechnical influences do not have to do anything with the personality of the writer. With the work with impression characters it can be however that here purely material-technical influences are effective. Also for Graphologen it is very meaningful to concern itself with writetechnical influences.

Summary

The practical work of a handwriting expert differs from the practical work of a Graphologen or a writing psychologist. In the research there are however points of contact, which are interesting for both ranges.

The forensische handwriting comparing is know-how shank. There are here no interpretations or interpretations separates only observable findings and a set of evaluation rules, which must be justified experience-scientifically.

Writing psychology as basic discipline investigates the psychological, physiological, writetechnical and social developing conditions of handwritten write achievements with experience-scientific methods.

Literature

• Vein January, Rolf (Hrsg.) (2000): Marker of abusive consumption of alcohol; Stuttgart, scientific publishing house company

• Bavarian flax, walter (1996): Practice manual expert right; Munich, C.H. Beck

• Hecker, Manfred (1993): Forensi handwriting investigation - a systematic representation of research, investigation and proof value -, Heidelberg, Kriminalistik publishing house

• Army man, Magdalene (1977): Write movement therapy as Psychotherapieform with behavior-disturbed, neuro tables children and young people; Munich, Ernst Reinhardt

• Michel, Lothar (1982): Judicial comparison of handwritings - an introduction to bases, methods and practice; Berlin, walter de Gruyter

• Michel, Lothar (1984): For a writing psychology as basic discipline; Magazine for people customer, 48, 278-288

• Mueller, W.H. /Enskat, A. (19873): Graphologi diagnostics; Berne, Hans Huber

• Pan, Heinrich (1961): Text book of the Graphologie; Berlin, walter de Gruyter

• Seibt, Angelika (1994): Writing psychology - theories, research results, science-theoretical bases; Munich, profile

• Seibt, Angelika (1997): Method of writing-comparative investigations; Magazine for people customer, 61, 87-101

• Seibt, Angelika (1999): Forensi record respecting - introduction to method and practice; Munich, C.H. Beck

• Seibt, Angelika (2000): Writing-comparative finding collection: Scales and measuring techniques; Magazine for writing psychology and comparison of handwritings, 64, 38-53

• Seibt, Angelika (2004a): Quality criteria forensischer record respecting; Magazine for writing psychology and comparison of handwritings 68, 44-62

• Seibt, Angelika (2004b): Forensi comparison of handwritings and writing psychology; Kriminalistik 4/04, 267-272

• Seibt, Angelika (2005a): Probability as hypothesis comparison, Kriminalistik 3/05, 175-179

• Seibt, Angelika (2005b): Methodically structured procedure as means of the quality assurance, magazine for writing psychology and comparison of handwritings 69, 130-178

• Wallner, Teut (1998): Text book of the writing psychology - foundation of a systematized handwriting diagnostics; Heidelberg, Asanger

• Wildt, Marzella (1990): Pathological changes of the handwriting, University of Mannheim, thesis

• Carpenter, Peter (2001): For which an expert can cling in such a way everything, and why like that is; The expert, 28, pages 21-34, pages 53-63 and pages 85-92

Related links

• http://www.schriftvergleichung.de/ - resuming information to comparison of handwritings