Privatisation generally means the same like denationalization: It designates the change from the public special right to private law, which transition of national jurisdiction/control and/or welfare service obligation to private-economical activity, in which then the public interest must be considered less, since also profits must be made, while often only the loss minimization was the center of attention before.
It is differentiated between different kinds of a privatisation from functions of the administration:
With respect to the linguistic usage between these different meanings of the term "privatisation" is frequently not differentiated cleanly. To the confusion also it contributes that in practice often combines two of three different circumstances arise (examples: Transformation and allocation of the Federal Post Office in three AGs and sales of Telekom shares, sales of federal printering to a private enterprise).
The opposite of the privatisation is the nationalization.
The legal situation in Germany sets only few limits to the privatisation. The Basic Law does not contain an final catalog of the state functions. Even so far the Basic Law e.g. over the welfare state principle certain public tasks plans, does not prescribe it not that these must take place compellingly via the state, if private carriers can settle this just as well. The liberal fundamental right catalog favours the dismantling of public monopolies even. Also increasing Europeanizing of the commercial law limits the clearance of national economic activity increasingly. A genuine border for privatisations offers kind 33 in Germany however the function reservation of the exp. 4 Basic Law, which plans that the practice of sovereignty-legal powers is to be usually transferred the official. This e.g. prevents that the police tasks in the closer sense are denationalized.
In the Federal Republic of Germany several large mechanisms and special estates of the federation were converted into private property forms:
In Austria for privatisation purposes the Austrian industrial getting thing AG was created. It continues as "privatisation agency" and participation getting thing, portions
1998 was transferred beyond that the the portions of the federation of the Dorotheum and of the Austrian state State of, Austrian Airlines Austrian one of air traffic AG and airport Vienna AG for participation administration.
In Switzerland national enterprises are on canton and district level, the federation only in the infrastructure and arms range to active became business mostly. Many federal enterprises and kantonalen enterprises, particularly in the infrastructure and bank range, so far into private-economical legals form were only converted, were not denationalized however. Examples for it are:
With the sales of the airline SWISS to Lufthansa it did not concern a privatisation, since Swiss state was only financially involved there, without being owners.
In opinion of the proponents privately led enterprises settle tasks more efficiently than the public hand. Publicly led enterprises are often high-subsidized losing transactions.
By competition of private competitors come it to price reductions for products and services. For example the costs of telecommunication service achievements constantly sank in Germany since the privatisation of the Federal Postal Administration.
Within the denationalized ranges develop also one a desirable new service culture, which steps to the place of a former official mentality. The market can fulfill needs better than an often ponderous (national) administration. By the competition of different offerers steige the quality.
Also lead privatisation to a multiplicity more at services, services and products. An example of it are fast Internet connections over DSL in Germany. To critics of the former national monopolist accused this innovation readiness lacking and doubt that it would have given DSL connections in Germany so fast at all.
The partial privatisation of the transmitter frequencies of the television under Helmut Kohl (private televisions) brought a large increase in program variety and thus more options for the consumer. The public transmitters were so forced to change program plans over and to set more to similarly popular transmissions.
Besides the state is to withdraw itself in principle from as much as possible denationalizable ranges and be limited to tasks of core, because this promotes the economic growth and the occupation after restaurant economics theories finally.
See also: in the state theory
We found here 69 articles.
We found here 5 related websites.
Index | Privacy | Terms Of Use | Sitemap | Feedback