With the Prospect Theory, in German also new expectation theory mentioned, of Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky out of the year 1979 concern it a descriptive decision theory, which represents an alternative to the expectation use theory. It can illustrate deviations like the Allais paradox and the Ellsberg paradox.
The decision-making process with the Prospect Theory is divided into two phases:
In the first phase the information, approximately to decision alternatives, is prepared and simplified. Thus e.g. same consequences of a Lotterie are painted or summarized consequences. In this phase also the point of reference is set, because with the Prospect Theory profits and losses are consulted for the evaluation of a Lotterie and not the final ability as with the expectation use theory. At the end of the editing phase a mental representation (subjectively) of the relevant components of the decision situation which can be processed stands. This result is called decision frame.
In the evaluation phase the individual decision consequences and their probabilities of entrance are evaluated: Thus the information is consolidated to each alternative to a so-called total value. At the end of this phase the decision stands for that alternative with the highest total value.
The crucial aspects of the Prospect Theory are:
The Prospect Theory was developed further 1992 to the Cumulative Prospect Theory, in order to eliminate some weaknesses of the original theory. By the cumulative transformation of the probabilities, stochastically dominated alternatives place no more problem there and the probability weighting function are no longer unstable at the terminator points. The moreover different weighting functions were accepted above and below the point of reference.
We found here 4 related websites.
Index | Privacy | Terms Of Use | Sitemap | Feedback